352
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Spirit Airlines issued an apology after putting a six-year-old unaccompanied minor on the wrong flight.

The child was set to fly on Thursday from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers, Florida, to visit his grandmother, WINK-TV reported.

Instead, the boy was “incorrectly boarded” on a flight to Orlando, Spirit acknowledged in a statement on Saturday.

The statement did not address how the error came to take place - during a busy holiday travel day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 11 months ago

Never understood American laws, I mean, don't let go your kids to a party could be child abuse but letting your six-years-old flying alone it's totally fine.. WTF?..

[-] linux2647@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Usually minors are accompanied by an airline employee to ensure they get to their destination okay. I’m surprised Spirit Airlines didn’t do this

[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 11 months ago

Ok then sounds reasonable, thx for the info 👍👍

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 11 months ago

When the US Parcel Service was first introduced, a few people mailed their children.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/brief-history-children-sent-through-mail-180959372/

The first case was an 8 month old baby being delivered to his grandparents a few miles away by the postal worker on his route.

A more extreme case was a 4 year old sent 73 miles; a cousin who was a clerk with the rail mail service apparently accompanied her.

[-] calypsopub@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

One of my husband's ancestors was shipped across Texas by train as a child.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago

Even in Europe it's legal to let the airline deal with your kids. Personally I think it's insane and I would never trust them but it's totally legal because the airline is supposed to be responsible.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Europe, Asia, the Americas... it's legal around the world.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I did it many times with my daughter when she was young.

You have to accompany your child to the gate, where the gate agent puts a lanyard with identification and destination around her neck.

Then, flight attendants personally accompany the child into the plane, seat her, and note what seat she's in.

I was not allowed to leave the gate until the plane was in the air.

You must designate an adult to pick the child up at the destination at the gate. They must have photo ID that matches the designation before the airline will release the child.

Children can only go on direct flights. They are not allowed on flights that change planes.

I always found the system safe and friendly. Most flights would have several kids flying alone, so the crew would usually seat them all together and would pay them a lot of attention during the flight.

Around age twelve or thirteen, they no longer count as an unaccompanied minor. At that point, they can just fly like any regular passenger. To me, that's the more sketchy situation. I'd rather see that happen around age sixteen or so.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Different Americans think different things. There's no way in hell I'd let my kid fly alone at six!

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
352 points (98.6% liked)

News

23397 readers
1671 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS