682
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Wait maybe I am expressing myself wrong, I agree with you 100% and all the words i was writing were to confirm your pov :)

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Wait maybe I am expressing myself wrong, I agree with you 100% and all the words i was writing were to confirm your pov :)

Astroturfers will use debating tactics like seeming to be positive about a point while actually wording it so that it comes off as slightly negative, etc., especially so if they're expecting a lot of pushback.

I wasn't sure if you were doing that or not, but the 'attitude' of my reply was based on your original comment...

A lot of comments are saying that hamas hides behind civilians but from what I see and read hamas and civilians are a melting pot that is interwined due to the extreme oppression in gaza strip. Any palestinian civilian could understand and help or even just not condemn totally hamas due to their conditions and prolly Israel gladly label as hamas any slightly suspect palestinian top

In your original comment you didn't specify your own opinion of why that was right/wrong, you just stated it as fact, and left us to assume either way.

So my suggestion would be next time to elaborate more with a second paragraph, either agreeing or disagreeing with what you stated in the first paragraph.

[-] Bayz0r@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

In their defense, it was pretty clear to me what they meant from the get-go and your replies seemed unnecessarily hostile.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

In their defense, it was pretty clear to me what they meant from the get-go and your replies seemed unnecessarily hostile.

I truly don't think I was being unnecessarily hostile, as I did assume they were astroturfing in a stealthy sort of way (as I described). For that matter, the fact that you're defending them makes me suspect that you too are astroturfing to protect them.

The onus is on the speaker/commentor to speak fully, if they want to be understood fully, so that assumptions are not made, and misunderstanding do not happen. Trust me, I learned about that recently myself here on Lemmy lol.

I stand by what I said.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
682 points (93.8% liked)

World News

39167 readers
1088 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS