152
:wq!
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
152 points (75.3% liked)
linuxmemes
21281 readers
171 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Why is Ctrl-X intuitive? Shouldn't it be Ctrl-Q (for "quit")?
CTRL+eXit
In most apps, Ctrl-X means "cut", not "quit". Especially when it's a freakin' text editor!
I will grant you that it's more intuitive than vi, but that is a very, very low bar.
Ctrl-X in Nano is arguably more nonsensical, considering that vi was made in an era long (decades) before many of the conventions we know today came about. They were figuring it out in real time. And the criterium here is much simpler: it must be available on all keyboards so no fancy keys. That's all.
On the other hand, when nano decided to use Ctrl+X for eXit, Apples Ctrl+X/C/V had already been brought over to Windows and Apple, and was also the de facto way for most Linux apps to handle these inputs although I do think it came before any "official" efforts to standardize these shortcuts in desktop environments.
It doesn't have to be X, just the fact that it uses modifier keys is enough. It could be Q or anything else, just please, for the love of god, we live in the 21st century now, all keyboards have modifier keys, please, add modifier keys shortcuts as well.
And it's also an X, like any GUI app in any OS.
I know I always try GUI methods in console
That's normal for people that didn't grow up in the 70s and 80s and GUI wasn't the first thing they knew. I was a teen in the late 90s and early 00s, so yeah, we had GUIs for almost everything.
We're basically trying to do catchup with the cool kids, but let's face it, they live somewhat in the past regarding modifier keys and vi/vim.
Because it also sends the kill signal in every terminal I've witnessed yet... And you have it right on screen the second you start Nano.
I'm over here using Ctrl c all over the place to kill stuff...
Yeah, you could use that as well.
Can you please elaborate on the first part? It is not standard Linux terminal behavior to send the KILL signal on Ctrl+X.
Actually, you are right. I will stand by my point that Nano tells you what to press, but I wonder where I got the stuff about Ctrl+X... I am very positive that I have used it at some point (outside of Nano), but maybe my brain is playing tricks on me 🤔
Because nano just shows how to exit, as well as some other basic functions at bottom