306
submitted 1 year ago by HowRu68@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The letter says: “We know that high inequality undermines all our social and environmental goals. It corrodes our politics, destroys trust, hamstrings our collective economic prosperity and weakens multilateralism. We also know that without a sharp reduction in inequality, the twin goals of ending poverty and preventing climate breakdown will be in clear conflict.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Just bringing back inequality from current insane levels to the levels of the 80s/90s would give young people so much more food and housing security.

It's depressing to see what happened since 2008.

[-] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It wasn't since 2008, it was more or less since Reaganomics and the neoliberal push in the west around the same time. It's been the same shit ever since, and it's 100% bipartisan. In fact, the worst offender since Reagan was definitely Slick Willy Clinton, who killed Glass-Steagall and introduced the telecommunications act of 1996, allowing for consolidation of every media empire and telecom network, which severely limited broadcast journalism's investigative power. It's been nothing but mega mergers and 1% fuckery ever since. The last chance was Occupy, anyone else remember the lack of coverage? I was in Europe at the time and had to watch fucking RT to see anyone talking about it. They will never let that happen again.

What most of us need to remember, is that they never let it happen the first time around either.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a noticeable uptick in the wealth share of the top 1% after 2010, while their share had fallen en been quite stable between 1995 and 2010.

https://equitablegrowth.org/the-distribution-of-wealth-in-the-united-states-and-implications-for-a-net-worth-tax/

[-] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Looks like it briefly went down in 1995 and then started climbing around 9/11 and the war boom. Didn't the dot com bubble happen around 1995? I figure that could account for the random downturn.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
306 points (98.1% liked)

World News

38978 readers
1355 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS