637
Oh boy, goodie! (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 87 points 8 months ago

Technically this post is illegal until tomorrow, but I dig that.

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 109 points 8 months ago

It's tomorrow in some places ๐Ÿ˜‚.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Yeah but the IP was held by an American Company.

Happy New Year.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Would using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I love that we're having a whole hypothetical discussion about this. I think the time in the timezone where the rights were held probably took priority over the time for the poster of the image at the time of upload. Regardless of what timezone you post from, it would have been posted before midnight for Disney and the relevant courts.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That sounds to me like it's probably correct. ๐Ÿ‘

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago
[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago
[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago
[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

They used to be

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 8 months ago

Not really. I think it's considered free speech if it's sarcastic or a parody.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Free speech doesn't apply to Intellectual Property at all, or rather you're free to say whatever you want but you can still be sued for anything that you say.

What you're thinking of is "Fair Use".

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the clarification.

[-] ADTJ@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

" If Disney sues, we'll claim fair use...

Ho hi! "

[-] janus2@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago

"hi ho, hi ho, it's off to court we go..."

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 8 months ago

And fair use exists to protect free speech.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Yes, the infamous "sarcastic" exception to copyright.

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

It's still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.

[-] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

What do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Trademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey.

This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I'm not a lawyer, though.

[-] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

This is the one from steamboat willy though

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago
[-] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

As of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
637 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1070 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS