102
Coroner calls on Google and Amazon to act after British woman’s suicide
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
102 points (90.5% liked)
Technology
59436 readers
1405 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There's some nuance here too
Say barriers on bridges and high areas that the public can access. It's removing an option yes, but it might be enough friction to stop the person till they can receive the help they need
I concede the benefit of barriers to prevent accidents, or to discourage people from jumping from this point right here. Delaying the impulse. We don't deny people the knowledge of gravity, and we don't legistate the removal of high places. If someone really wants to jump they have options, hiking to a cliff etc.
Let's say there is a magic pill, that is painless, no side effects, etc. let's say we made this available for people's pets in pain, but not for humans in pain. In this fictional universe the gatekeeping of "enough pain" to justify a dignified and self selected exit is a net evil. As long as a human has agency they should have a choice without officials gatekeeping their knowledge. (I.e. we shouldn't nanny adults)
I don't think the main point of the barriers is preventing suicide specifically, but safety in general. Preventing suicide is more of a bonus.