863
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by SuperSpaceFan@lemmy.ca to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Paywall-free link: https://archive.is/eV7A5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

But companies are owned separately. Reducing office costs would increase the value of the renting company while decreasing the value of commercial real estate, regardless of their ownership.

Investors owning both real estate and the companies renting that real estate are not colluding. One investor who owns 90% stocks and 10% real estate is not going to help out another investor who owns 90% real estate and 10% stocks.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
863 points (96.9% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS