191

Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox's relevance should be spiking right now due to Google's shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hypx@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

No. This is just a return to the days of the IE-only web. It will be problematic but it won't be the end of the web.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

It wasn't really IE-only. People sort of could use Netscape, and then Mozilla, and then Firefox. And Opera which wasn't free.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
191 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

37745 readers
216 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS