1206
Jan 6th (lemy.lol)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stinerman@midwest.social 35 points 1 year ago

He should be but the 14th Amendment keeps him out only if he previously took an oath to the Constitution. You can go all out full shooting war against the federal government but as long as you weren't already elected or appointed or whatever, you're still eligible.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

He was in the military and therefore swore an oath. He's absolutely disqualified under the 14th amendment.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

That is my interpretation too. It feels wrong or at least lacking.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Now if only we could make changes to it somehow... Like amend it or something?

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Amendments need a functioning government willing to change shit for the better in a bipartisan way. That's not going to happen for a long time.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
1206 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5967 readers
3453 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS