330
Wife of financier who called for Harvard head’s exit faces plagiarism allegations
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
330 points (98.0% liked)
News
37739 readers
538 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
But she’s white, unlike the Harvard president. So it’s all cool.
She's a Republican, which means there is no expectation of self-consistency or morality.
Well, she is not Harvard president - a position that requires highest integrity. She is launching some company (according to the article), so, it is not as important. However, the irony is huge here.
She's a hypocrite.
When has she ever involved herself in this? It's her husband, and she's probably not happy that his attack has resulted in this exposure of her plagiarism.
She would be hypocrite if she though that she herself is acceptable for the same position. Which she might do, and in that case she would be a hypocrite, but we do not know for sure.
She never criticized anyone, she's probably pretty pissed her husband went on this crusade and it ended up wrecking her reputation too.
But, his billions of dollars will cushion the blow.
She never criticized anyone. Her husband did.
What? Neri Oxman and her husband are two different people who can hold opposing views. I understand the situation and why her husband is being criticized for his hypocrisy.
The person I was responding to literally wrote that she was the hypocrite for making statements against Claudine Gay, which is not the truth.