294
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

RIP Microsoft WordPad. You Will Be Missed::It's truly the end of an era as we say farewell to a real one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I bounced around between LibreOffice and OpenOffice for years as I was too cheap to pay for Word. Mainly Libre.

Finally broke down and paid for Office365 when I was struggling to display some (I believe) docx files at the same time my wife was requesting we get it for her work (and this doesn't even get into struggling to get stuff to display properly for word uses which was constantly a problem).

And man, is it lightyears better than libreoffice. And sure it's slower, it does a ton more stuff, but if it feels slow to you. . .what kind of computer are you running? I use it on my 8 year old laptop all the time and have never really thought it felt slow.

Wordpad I didn't even realize still existed. Just looking at it now, I see why. I see very little I gain from NP++ (or I've even switched over to VSCode for a lot of things).

I feel like you are making the case for why the only "easy" replacement costs money. The free versions are all extremely limited, or aren't very good.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'll admit I exaggerated slightly (I just opened both today). I have a gaming laptop with a Ryzen 9 5900HX, and opened up both apps from battery power.

WordPad took about 1.5s to open, which is longer than usual.

Word took about 6s to open, which is normal even if I'm plugged in.

LibreOffice would actually take more like 15s to open under these circumstances, which is why I said it's slow. The clunky part is due to the UX.

Even notepad took over a second to open as well.

I guess I expect more when I have a near top of the line CPU and it pains me to think that it's even slower for the vast majority of people.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I guess I'm just not too concerned with start up times, having come from the age of HDD. 6 seconds to start, as long as it's not lagging while I'm using it, is almost unnoticeable.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah that makes sense. I also have a high end SSD so that might also be inflating my expectations.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
294 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS