350
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

“The president has been adamant that we need to restore Roe. It is unfathomable that women today wake up in a country with less rights than their ancestors had years ago,” Fulks said.

Biden has been poised to run on what has been described as the strongest abortion rights platform of any general election candidate as he and his allies look to notch a victory in the first presidential election since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.

Last month, Biden seized on a case in Texas, where a woman, Kate Cox, was denied an abortion despite the risk to her life posed by her pregnancy.

“No woman should be forced to go to court or flee her home state just to receive the health care she needs,” Biden said of the case. “But that is exactly what happened in Texas thanks to Republican elected officials, and it is simply outrageous. This should never happen in America, period.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Man if only there was some other piece of legislation they got passed during that 2 months... Maybe the largest healthcare overhaul in generations?

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The one that said it was illegal to not buy health insurance? The "compromise" that turned it into a huge win for the insurance industry? And it still sounds like people are going bankrupt because of medical issues or having treatments blocked because some insurance asshole disagrees with their doctor.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Yes, the one that was neutered completely by republicans which was somehow Obama's fault for doing something instead of nothing, the very thing being condemned in this thread

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Weren't we talking about a period of time when the Dems controlled the presidency, house and senate?

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That wasn't the case when the aca was created

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Controlled". If having a monolithic voting bloc is your number one issue, then go vote Republican. By the way, they're not any better at passing legislation, so don't get your hopes up.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I have no vote in that race, just watching the dumpster fire from my own dumpster that itself is smoldering a bit.

[-] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh I remember, that’s the one that the Republicans literally created as RomneyCare

Democrats, assisting fascists since the invention of liberalism

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I love how the guy you're responding to brought up the ACA, clearly unaware of all the sabotage the Democratic party did to it before they allowed the broken husk to pass. There were at least half a dozen Democrats involved, but don't forget what really brings the joke home, the Dems even had a ~~fall guy~~ intransigent senator to blame with a D by his name!! The man single- handedly destroyed the public option. Gosh, they were so close to 60 votes too!!

Fuck me, they accidentally provided the perfect example of how the Democrats "win" when they have power.

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Lieberman was an independent at the time. For fuck's sake, if you're going to turf, at least get some of facts right.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hmm? Lieberman wasnt who i was talking about my good man. Cmon, which Democrat, who was previously an insurance executive, blocked the public option? This info should be enough for you to Google their names.

I know this because i was there! See, back then i believed in, voted for, and even donated to the DNC! I have been watching a long time!

(Or i have been studying in a special putin camp where they teach 'turfers to know the history of your country's politics b/c i am a Russia astroturfer)

Or maybe, I'm a good ol American who is actually a trumpet in disguise! Maybe i really love trump but unlike most magats im kinda good at talking so they made me a liason to trick only the dumbest democrats! Only the dumbest of course, because the smartest of you guys immediately smell out any dissidents and call them 'turfers.

We Magats didn't make a very smart plan in that case, but what do you expect? We are dumb haha.

Which of the two am i? Definitely i am not who i have consistently said i am.

Definitely i am not an embittered ex-democrat who went hard for bernie and watched my own party crush him (oops thats a different 'turfers job, sorry Vladmir)

Definitely im not a real person trying to figure out what to do in a country i feel doesn't listen to me, or really any of us... definitely not losing hope some days.... Definitely i don't think to myself some days about the dichotomy of feeling when i post:

how much i want you to believe this is happening so i can have an ally, maybe one more person to see what it happening, vs. how little i want you to believe my message. Since even if i convinced you, id feel bad about the stress and pain you were about to go thru (the same i have been in since my realization). How little i wish that feeling of powelessness on anyone! I hate this feeling! I have no answers, only the black void of reality to share with you... Im fine that you don't believe, especially since i have no answers on what we should do next. If what im saying is true, you'll figure it out on your own time anyway.

If i were you, id rather believe i was a turfer too. See yah around comrade

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Fucking breadcrumbs. Banks and insurance companies benefited more from Obama's presidency than the American people.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
350 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS