61
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

Due to a power issue, it looks like the lander may now no longer have sufficient fuel to make a controlled landing on the moon. This was the lander that was set to carry human remains to the moon despite objections from the Navajo nation. Hopefully, this discourages any future attempts at such a stunt, since instead of a permanent mausoleum your ashes may instead be stranded in orbit or scattered amongst the moon dust if the thing crashes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

I didn't want to acknowledge it before you brought it up since I thought it was such a silly thing to say, and honestly didn't think you would continue the hypothetical in that direction.

[-] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

my point is that, while i can understand the moon as an important religious site for indigenous people and that should be respected, that should be the reason we don't do stuff like do corpse disposal on it, NOT because it's "useless" or "pointless" (which ultimately could be extended to be said of pretty much ANYTHING we do for our own personal satisfaction now which ends up meaning nothing later on)

[-] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 7 points 10 months ago

That's fair, although I do think that it's immoral to be wasteful when the known costs of an endeavor so greatly outstrips the realizable utility.

[-] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

I think it isn’t really possible to measure usefulness vs cost in a solid objective way, so it’s probably best to just say it’s wasteful until we achieve global communism, at which point we’ll make the sun cannon a globally available utility

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

In the liberal economy we have, we can compare the cost of such an endeavor to the cost of other endeavors -- building hospitals or whatever -- and then consider the respective likely outcomes and ask "Which is preferable?" Wasting money on some stupid vanity project that defaces the last clean surface people get to see is made all the more egregious by the ravages of poverty that we can see down on Earth, and pontificating about "what is the point of anything, rlly?" is just a crass deflection from that fact.

[-] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah and I’m not justifying the weirdo rich man sending rocket debris into space

I wasn’t trying to deflect from anything, what the rich person is doing is dumb. They’re instating an actual physical claim on the planet which is idiotic in every way.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23313 readers
176 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS