394
submitted 9 months ago by Chriszz@lemmy.world to c/greentext@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 78 points 9 months ago

Wouldnt this be the reverse, with the prey animal only being able to see a 4:3 with both eyes?

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

No, they see more of the sides to detect predators. Predators eyes are forward, narrow cone of vision

[-] butter@midwest.social 14 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't call it narrow. It's almost 180 degrees. More than enough for a 16x9 monitor

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The point is how much you can see without moving your eyes.

Yeah we can technically see a pretty wide range but that's mainly peripheral. You can't really make out details unless you move your eyes to look directly at something.

Whereas prey animal eyes aren't supposed to be super detail oriented in the first place. So they can see more without moving their eyes to look directly at something because details aren't important.

[-] BearGun@ttrpg.network 1 points 9 months ago

okay but that has nothing to do with field of view, which is what the example is about.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It has everything to do with field of view... the region in which is you can resolve detailed information is very narrow, at only ~15º.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
394 points (92.8% liked)

> Greentext

7486 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS