289
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Research says involuntary celibate men make "fundamental errors" about what women want in a partner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

Malignant misogyny isn't mental illness.

We can address problems with male alienation, isolation, and loneliness without having to coddle terrorist reactionaries.

[-] Evia@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

No but that doesn't mean it doesn't need addressing

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

that depends on what you mean by addressing - there's a ton of apologism for incels, as if they're being persecuted.

https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2021/07/12/political-discrimination-as-civil-rights-struggle/

So yeah, there's a spectrum here and women accepting abusive and misogynist partners is definitely in the right wing playbook.

[-] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Providing mental help does not equal women accepting abusive partners, how tf did you make that mental leap?

Edit: Upon reread, I see that you were genuine, and I actually do need to check and correct myself. Apologies.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

how tf did you make that mental leap?

did you read the link or just jump into the comments with a rageon? because the link explains how the right wing thinks of this shit. I didn't make it up, they did.

[-] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My bad, I assumed we were actually staying on topic - getting incels mental help. I'll correct myself and assume from now on that any comments that fail to make sense are bad-faith attempts to co-opt a post.

Edit: Upon reread, I see that you were genuine, and I actually do need to check and correct myself. I apologize.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

yeah I got that. that’s why I responded:

that depends on what you mean by addressing

because there’s a wide array of responses and I’m genuinely curious to learn what the OP of this thread meant. Not because I was attacking their premise, but because there’s past history of this tact - that the world should accommodate a percentage of the population who have shown misogynistic tendencies. To which I say: nah. nope. naw.

[-] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

I apologize. I've been up for twenty-four hours, the last twelve of which were on a delayed and then stranded bus in a snow storm. I was taking out my frustrations on you, and was needlessly snarky.

Upon reread, I see that you were genuine, and I actually do need to check and correct myself. I'll leave my earlier comments up with an edit.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Really living up to your third ideal there. Genuine respect for acknowledging fault in an internet argument

[-] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Journey before destination, the next step is always the most important.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
289 points (95.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
1211 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS