9
submitted 9 months ago by haxor@derp.foo to c/hackernews@derp.foo

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ForgetPrimacy@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

These aren't nuclear reactors. This isn't a miniaturized Chernobyl in your pocket, a delicate balance between control rods and radioactive material maintaining the right proximity to critical mass. This is a rock that's (metaphorically) kinda warm and takes some decades to become noticably "cooler" and we can use that temperature differential to power tiny devices (and we have used these devices continuously since the 70s)

The thing that nuclear reactors (and weapons) use is the chain reaction of certain radioactive materials whereby the decay of atoms can be triggered by the decay of a previous atom. That is not the mechanism nuclear batteries use and they in fact are incapable of that chain reaction; the radioactive materials that nuclear batteries are made of don't work the same way as the special isotopes of uranium or plutonium.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
9 points (71.4% liked)

Hacker News

14 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS