475
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The cost to overdraw a bank account could drop to as little as $3 under a proposal announced by the White House, the latest effort by the Biden administration to combat fees it says pose an unnecessary burden on American consumers, particularly those living paycheck to paycheck.

The change could potentially eliminate billions of dollars in fee revenue for the nation’s biggest banks, which were gearing up for a battle even before Wednesday’s announcement. Exactly how much revenue depends on which version of the new regulation is adopted.

Banks charge a customer an overdraft fee if their bank account balance falls below zero. Overdraft started as a courtesy offered to some customers when paper checks used to take days to clear, but proliferated thanks to the growing popularity of debit cards.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

overdraft fees only affect people who don't have a lot of money. I remember being ruined by them as a college student several times. they should be illegal. let them figure out how to get the operating revenue from people with more capital.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

I dropped Wells Fargo after they re-ordered my pending payments to maximize overdraft fees.

I'd actually overdrawn like 25 bucks after making a couple 3-5 dollar purchases followed by $50 purchase. They moved the big payment up front so each of those little payments incured a 30 dollar fee.

Fuck them.

[-] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago

This, never do business with Wells Fargo.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I had that happen too with BoA, a long time ago. My initial reaction was "how in the fuck is this legal?!"

Then I nearly blacked out as a torrent of un-forgotten media, of all the jokes, comedic hate, and disparaging sentiment towards banks, flooded back to my minds eye.

Sadly, my only answer to this problem was "make more money", which really isn't an answer at all. Later, I switched to a credit union, which I would have done earlier had I known that was an option.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure this was (is?) standard practice for every major bank, bc Citizens did the same thing to me. With no regulation, why wouldn't a bank fuck its most vulnerable customers as hard as possible?

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Exactly. What's worse is that it's almost justifiable if you consider how a bank makes money: float. If a huge swath of your account holders are maintaining as close to a $0 balance as possible, they're costing you money to manage all the related overhead. I say "almost" because if they, oh I don't know, made savings accounts attractive for small timers (say 4% interest on balances below $200), it might not require a collections department to gather forcibly extracted fictitious income.

[-] Stowaway@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

I dropped them when they charged me an overdraft fee because I over drafted because they charged me an overdraft fee. Then they charged me an over draft fee for over drafting because if the second overdraft fee. Most expensive $5 in gas I've ever paid for.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

I worked as a banker there in the early 2000s and those OD fees was brutal. I remembered when it went from $24 to $35 and how much it completely devastated people's lives.

Right before I quit, ANYONE with an OD fee that I saw, I just reversed it without question. Then I got in trouble for reversing thousands of dollars before I was written up. I put in my 2 weeks after and in those 2 weeks kept on reversing charges.

I would tell people to not bank here when I worked there unless you have at LEAST 25k cash or investments or a mortgage over 250k. Otherwise, you're going get FUCKED by fees.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I remember when they hosted this whole festival in my town giving away free hotdogs and just going way over the top....

The fact that this was like a week after Wells Fargo was officially banned from doing business in California and really needed a good PR win likely had NOTHING to do with it... rolls eyes

My sister has an almost identical story with that bank.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I've heard of shit like this, and not just from banks. A friend of mine had his insurance drop him without telling him, solely so they could send him a notice about it in the hopes that he'd renew and have to pay extra in "Coverage Gap" fees....

This shit needs to be illegal.

[-] thatsux0rz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Had U.S. Bank do that to me when I was a high-schooler on my first job. Time stamps on the transactions came in pending - next morning I had 2 overdrafts and fees to go with them. Cleared that account out the next day after getting them to waive the fees.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
475 points (98.6% liked)

News

36384 readers
870 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS