138
Arnold Schwarzenegger held at Munich airport over luxury watch
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
138 points (94.2% liked)
News
23301 readers
1135 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Tell me you're assisting with corruption without telling me you're assisting with corruption.
There is absolutely no reason to charge half as cash unless you want physical money to conveniently forget to report.
Why do you think so many slightly shady businesses offer cash discounts? If your answer is "only card fees" then you may want to double check that last apple gift card you sent to grandma for her IRS bill actually made it to her.
I don't care if it's John down the street or a major world government. Someone somewhere saw this and thought "ooh, more money we can accidentally misreport"
Sure is a shame that the 17.5k never made it to it's destination. That 15k could have come in handy. You never know when 10k could be useful for stopping terrorists that bring watches into the country. Hard to believe that 5k could be useful, but that 2k is going to be stretched as far as it can go.
First of, I couldn't find anything to corroborate the ~~experience~~ existence of such a rule.
The article might not be entirely accurate.
But even if it were true, you think customs officials just take your money without giving you a receipt?
And how would underreporting even work if the amount is exactly specified?
"Yes, we fined him for 20k, he paid 10k by card and here are the other 8k in cash."
In the US, the way it works is that the cash part never makes it onto the report, though more commonly this happens when the police do a "no knock raid" on "the wrong house" and then empty the family safe. The contents of the safe simply never get reported as evidence or mysteriously disappear from the evidence room without being reported as missing, like a fairly decent portion of the drugs taken as evidence every year does.
In this hypothetical scenario, if he paid by card you'd already have evidence that he was fined and what 50% of the amount was.
So the customs guys would have to bring in the same amount in cash. How would the cash part not make it into the report if there were a rule that there must be a cash part?
And once that is deposited in the bank, nobody can just walk in and make some of it disappear.
Yeah, after making that comment I realized the whole "customs gives you a receipt" thing, whereas the scenario I was talking about basically comes down to your word vs theirs, and what they write in their report. It's a scenario with a lot less accountability than customs has.