1053
submitted 10 months ago by realitista@lemm.ee to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] force@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

how is it dumb? literally just press ctrl shift esc

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If your computer is locked up, you have to use ctrl-alt-del, with its menu of options including the task manager, in order to interrupt the current processes locking up the system.

Using ctrl-shift-esc launches the task manager program without a system interrupt, meaning it won't unlock the computer. Which is dumb, because why else would I be opening the task manager other than to interrupt some out-of-control process? I guess you could be using it to monitor or something else, but that's what I'm used to opening the task manager to be doing. I didn't even realize this until this comment.

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I use task manager way more often for monitoring than I use it for stopping processes.

[-] SaltyIceteaMaker@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 10 months ago

When i was using windows i killed programs quite regularly with ctrl shift esc. I didn't need a full system interrupt but the programs weren't completely out if control.

[-] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

I check ram and cpu usage and change startup apps or task priority just as much as I need to force quit.

[-] force@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

then just press ctrl alt del if you want a system interrupt??? there's a reason they have bindings for both. it's not much harder, the task manager doesn't exist solely for killing some program that won't respond.

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
1053 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12655 readers
1987 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS