1440
The state of Playstore
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
Ads upon ads upon ads
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1440 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
58919 readers
3580 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
A single row of ads would be ok, but having this many plus an ad showing up first, where the search results should be... Oof
No it wouldn’t. Phones aren’t cheap.
The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices.
I'm not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain't putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they'd much prefer to run and maintain their own.
That's not true. Phone manufacturers need to pay if they want to include Google Play in their devices, it's not free. It can cost as much as $40 per device.
Thanks for the correction, I was unaware
I guess hoovering up all your data ain’t enough.
I don't even get why having the store on more devices is supposed to "cost" google anything.
It's a store. They get a cut from every transaction. Why wouldn't they want it to be on everything?