328

White House cancels $5 billion in student debt for 74k borrowers (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The announcement is the latest in a series of loan forgiveness actions by the administration after the Supreme Court last year struck down Biden's much broader plan.

In a new wave of student loan forgiveness, the Biden administration is canceling $5 billion in debt for 74,000 borrowers, many of whom worked in public sector jobs for more than a decade.

President Joe Biden said that 44,000 of Friday’s approved borrowers were having their education debt wiped clean after 10 years of public service, and that those borrowers included teachers, nurses and firefighters. Nearly 30,000 borrowers have worked toward repayment for at least 20 years but “never got the relief they earned through income-driven repayment plans,” Biden said in a statement.

It’s the latest round of loan forgiveness efforts after the Supreme Court struck down the White House’s student loan debt relief plan last year. Since the ruling, the White House has launched a series of smaller relief programs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Potatofish@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Wut

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 0 points 10 months ago

Here’s the fact sheet for the first cancellation move: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/24/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-student-loan-relief-for-borrowers-who-need-it-most/

$5-10k for lower- and middle-income borrowers. The legal challenge was that this was discriminatory (and it was.)

If the first action the Biden administration took was to cancel all the student debt the federal government guaranteed, the legal challenge would have fallen flat because the “injured parties” would not have been injured. Instead we’ve gotten this piecemeal bullshit designed to appease voters who are justifiably angry with the Biden administration but will have minimal impact on the actual problem of student debt or availability of higher education.

[-] Potatofish@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I see. So do you think it was intentional?

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net -1 points 10 months ago

I do. One of Biden’s longest-running bases of support is the financial industry, and any move that might suggest debt shouldn’t be a fact of life will scare the banks. In a more general sense, Biden is as much a machine democrat as Hillary Clinton, and for them anything that might disrupt the status quo is an absolute no-go. Student debt forgiveness for all would be a massive shock to the status quo.

[-] Potatofish@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's too conspiratorial for me. I'd have to see evidence of some kind other than past associations.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Thats the problem with politics pretty much anywhere. You rarely get anyone spelling out their actual motives. For an example of what it sounds like when a political strategist speaks openly, google “Lee Atwater southern strategy.”

All politicians talk and think like that, it’s just they’re usually really good about hiding it.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024

328 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers

1947 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News