view the rest of the comments
New Communities
A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.
Rules
The rules may be more established as time goes on, but it's important to have a foundation to work on.
1. Follow the rules of Lemmy.world - These rules are the same as Mastodon.world's rules, which can be found here.
2. Include a community title and description in your post title. - A following example of this would be New Communities - A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.
3. Follow the formatting. - The formatting as included below is important for people getting universal links across Lemmy as easily as possible.
Formatting
Please include this following format in your post:
[link text](/c/community@instance.com)
This provides a link that should work across instances, but in some cases it won't
You should also include either:
or instance.com/c/community
FAQ:
Q: Why do I get a 404?
A: At least one user in an instance needs to search for a community before it gets fetched. Searching for the community will bring it into the instance and it will fetch a few of the most recent posts without comments. If a user is subscribed to a community, then all of the future posts and interactions are now in-sync.
Q: When I try to create a post, the circle just spins forever. Why is that?
A: This is a current known issue with large communities. Sometimes it does get posted, but just continues spinning, but sometimes it doesn't get posted and continues spinning. If it doesn't actually get posted, the best thing to do is try later. However, only some people seem to be having this problem at the moment.
Image Attribution:
Fahmi, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
"c/palworld" will only work for people who are in lemmy.world. It's better to link the community as !palworld@lemmy.world, now everyone accesses it.
I'm apparently the second subscriber. I've been curious about this game; people describe it as "Pokémon with guns", but what interests me is "Pokémon minus The Pokémon Company and GameFreak". If they release a Linux version and are able to deliver a good singleplayer experience (I bloody hate multiplayer) I'm sold.
Try cassette beasts. Definitely scratches that itch. A great indie game.
Cassette Beasts is way better than it has any right to be.
Also shoutout to Monster Sanctuary. It's quite different but still a great monster taming game.
I'm checking it now, seems interesting. And Monster Sanctuary, mentioned by @simple@lemm.ee
Thank you both!
You're welcome. Enjoy!
Currently playing it on my Steam Deck. Proton handles it pretty well, performance is alright if you lock it to 30, and the controls all work, even with correct button prompts
That solves one of the matters (Linux). What about the other? Is its singleplayer fun?
Single player is fun if you like to play survival crafting games alone. “Pokémon with guns” is not actually a very good description. It’s a monster capturing game, and the creatures are cartoony like Pokémon, but it’s a third person survival crafting game. No turn based elements or choosing monster move sets or anything like that.
It’s more like Ark with Pokémon instead of dinosaurs
Yeah, it's Ark but infinitely less grindy and with Pokemon
You can choose power sets.
Palworld is better with friends because I have good friends but the game doesn't get twice as hard and frustrating when you're alone. I enjoy games that encourage coordination and teamwork , but I think that kind of gameplay would be out of place in such a whimsical world.
Honestly I would describe it as Ark-lite. It has base building/taming and that's pretty fun, and you can also get random encounters at your base. The leveling system is a bit grindy. There are dungeons and bosses in the world to go find and explore. The map is huge, I think I've hardly explored a tenth of it.
Been playing about 15 hours or so and enjoyed it, but the game is definitely early access. I've had a number of crashes, fell through the world a few times, etc. I'd give it a month or two if that bothers you.
Is singleplayer more compelling than Ark or Conan Exiles? Games like Valheim or Project Zomboid can completely take over my life but Ark/CE was always just kind of an aimless boring grind.
There's a tutorial that leads towards the first dungeon boss of the game, but after that it looks like you make your own challenges. There's a few bosses around my level that I'll be taking on next, then I'm probably going to explore to see if I can find more dungeons.
You have to tweak ARK (on your own server) to make it a good fit.
That’s completely subjective. Although if you find survival in general fun, you’ll probably feel right at home
I'm aware that fun value is subjective, but that was the way that I found to ask succinctly if it's possible to have fun even if you focus solely on singleplayer. (I'm not a big fan of MP).
A shame that the game didn't want to run at any acceptable speed in my machine. Otherwise I'd be almost for sure playing it, @pikasaurX4@lemm.ee even mentioned that it's Ark-like (I'd love Ark if not for the grinding, so...)
You can get Coromon to work on Linux. I play pretty much every creature collector game that gets released and Coromon is by far the most "a better version of Pokémon" I know.
People compare Palworld with Pokémon for superficial reasons, it really isn't a Pokémon-like game.
Honestly it feels like the pepole praising it for "Doing what gamefreak won't!"
Either haven't played Palworld or haven't played Pokemon
It's pretty much just ARK with more barebones gameplay and cute artstyle, yea
Reading more about Palworld made me even more interested on it, to be honest. Survival? Base-building? Automation? Fuck, I want this.
(I'll still check Coromon though. Thanks for the rec!)
And depending on your client, that opens up your Mail client if you have yet to interact with the community. The best thing the creator of the community and this post can do is post within their community so people can go to their profile and find the community that way.
It's really not "Pokemon, but not held back by GameFreak", it's more like "ARK, but it looks colorful, plays like BOTW, and has a Pokemon inspired creature catching gimmick"
If you're looking for an edgier, more creative version of Scarlet/Violet, keep looking.
If you're looking for "Minecraft Pixelmon, but for Adults"
This is for you
The game doesn't really want to run in my potato (it has 16GB RAM, and I tried to run it through WINE so...)
That's a shame because "Minecraft Pixelmon for adults" does sound nice for me. I also liked Ark quite a bit.
Indeed, you are the audience.