489

Republicans Push To Legalize ‘Property Owners’ Killing Homeless People in Kentucky (www.vice.com)

submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In Kentucky, politicians are preparing to vote on a law that would authorize the use of force against unhoused people who are found to be camping on private property.

Republican politicians in Kentucky are rallying behind a new bill that would authorize the use of force—and potentially deadly force—against unhoused people who are found to be camping on private property. The bill would also criminalize unsanctioned homeless encampments and restrict cities and towns from preempting state laws.

The bill, known as the “Safer Kentucky Act,” or HB5, would target homelessness, drug possession and mental illness by drastically increasing criminal penalties for a range of offenses. Introduced last week by Republican state representative Jared Bauman, it already has 52 sponsors in Kentucky’s House of Representatives. A vote is scheduled for this week.

Advocates are most alarmed by one aspect of the “Safer Kentucky Act” in particular: an anti-homeless provision that would authorize violence by property owners on people camping on their property. The bill says the use of force is “justifiable” if a defendant believes that criminal trespass, robbery or “unlawful camping” is occurring on their property.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 131 points 9 months ago

the party of jesus, folks.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago

It's a shame American Evangelicals can't read, or they'd realize they've been worshipping a filthy commie the whole time.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Wait until they find out he was a brown skinned middle easterner.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

Jordan? Judah? Michael? Matthew? Luke? Those are all nice Christian boy names.

[-] Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Supply Side Jesus for sure.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Hmmm, WWJD, What would Jesus do?

Set them on fire and send them to hell.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Jesus beating up merchants who set up shop outside a temple is canon. We have evidence Jesus has the will and capacity for violence and what he would do in an American state or federal legislative building would probably freak a lot of people out.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

He didn't just flip tables and whip the moneychangers. He was so full of righteous fury that he left, and took hours to braid his own whip, came back, and then started flipping tables and whipping moneychangers.

In my head I like to envision him sitting on a rock, braiding the whip, and muttering to himself. Shit like:

"Mother fuckers, I swear to Dad, you don't even know what Monopoly is yet, and I'm gonna show you the proper ending to the Milton Bradley version of that game."

While the Apostles are just huddled around bewildered and scared since they have no clue what's about to happen, since they'd NEVER seen him even irritated before.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Second time I need to drop Supply Side Jesus in a day: https://imgur.com/gallery/bCqRp

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024

489 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers

2554 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News