287

The call, an apparent imitation or digital manipulation of the president's voice, says, "Voting this Tuesday only enables the Republicans in their quest to elect Donald Trump again."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thantik@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They actually can.

https://i.redd.it/45h41oozgag21.png

Wrong again. They CANNOT.

Source: https://www.bazelon.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2016_State-Laws-Affecting-Voting-Rights-of-PWD.pdf

Wishing for something to be the way you want, does NOT make it the way you want. Calling someone a bigot for telling you factual information just shows how brainwashed you are.

Here's the same with restriction on owning firearms:
https://everytownresearch.org/rankings/law/mental-health-prohibitor/

We CAN, and ALREADY DO restrict the voting rights of those who fail to pass a certain bar of intelligence and or mental continuity.

And as for retarded:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/11/AR2010021103896.html

The term "mentally retarded" was itself introduced by the medical establishment in the 20th century to supplant other terms that had been deemed offensive.

By the 1960s, "mental retardation" became the preferred medical term, gradually replacing previous diagnostic standards such as "idiot," "imbecile" and "moron" -- terms that had come to carry pejorative connotations.

The term "retardation" was common in my home and life, but it was sterile and clinical.

So how about you educate yourself some...

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

No, man.

You came in here posting absolutely disgusting ableist slurs and spewing discriminatory bullshit that's not true. Then after you get called out on it by everyone, you've start changing your tune, cherry picking specific circumstances that if that had been what you originally said, we'd have ended up in a different conversation. But instead we're having this garbage conversation that you decided to start.

And as for "hey look, people used this word in the 60s all the time!" I'll point you to every other slur, whether ableist, racist, sexist, or whatever. You know what? People used them all in the past with impunity. That doesn't make it ok to use them today.

Instead of just Googling things that support your prejudice and confirm your existing biases, try searching for the counterarguments.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I didn't change my tune at all, this is exactly what I was referring to, but you kneejerk reactionaries decided I was being "not nice" and that was good enough reason for you to dismiss me. "Ableist" is just another way for you to claim victimization, because that's all the internet is now. Everyone rushing to claim victim as fast as possible because that justifies any action they take. It justifies not actually holding a discussion, because you've been "wronged".

Grow the hell up and actually discuss the topic at hand, instead of attacking the person, their characteristics, and which "team" you think they play for or ulterior motives they have. All of lemmy is populated with you victimization weirdos like it's some sort of fetish you have to be persecuted.

The original point I made, was that our democracy is at stake if some simple robocalls to idiots, morons, and retards can change the course of our nation. Robocalls don't have to come from other US Citizens, so allowing this is tantamount to allowing other nations to control our voting.

Mods here will keep deleting my PERFECTLY valid argument, because they dislike the TYPES of words that I use. It doesn't make my argument less valid. In this particular instance, I am referring directly to intelligence and its hand in the direction of our governing. Intelligence isn't something I am "discriminating" against here, I am using it in a technical sense to describe the problems that it comes with. But you can't see the fucking forest for the trees.

NORMAL people have these discussions on the daily. They don't just turn around and walk away because someone said "retard". Grow a thicker skin for fucks sake you absolute child.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

The original point I made

The only point you've made is that you're a bigot who is not interested in honest discussion. And you keep making it by repeating the same bullshit.

Grow a thicker skin for fucks sake you absolute child.

Says the guy whining about mods deleting his content.

I'll hand it to you -- you've put on a masterclass-worthy performance of a bigot having a breakdown because nobody takes him seriously. You've blamed me, you've blamed the mods, and you've blamed lemmy. The only person who hasn't done anything wrong here is you.

When everyone in the world is giving you problems, it's time to consider that maybe you're the problem. And if the users and mods on lemmy are too harsh for you, then maybe you should go back to Truth Social or wherever the big-brained adults like yourself hang out.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
287 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS