241
submitted 10 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

Family members of Israelis held hostage in the Gaza Strip have stormed a parliamentary meeting in Jerusalem to demand that Israel’s government does more to return their loved ones, as fighting in Khan Younis reached unprecedented levels.

About 20 relatives of people seized as captives by the Palestinian militant group in the 7 October attack disrupted a Knesset finance committee meeting on Monday, chanting: “Release them now, now, now!”

One woman, who has three family members taken by Hamas, cried: “Just one I’d like to get back alive, one out of three.” Other protesters held up signs reading: “You will not sit here while they die there.”

On Sunday, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, rejected new Hamas conditions for ending the war and releasing the hostages including the Islamist group retaining control of Gaza and Israel withdrawing completely. In response, a Hamas official in Qatar said Netanyahu’s refusal to end the military offensive in Gaza meant there was “no chance for the return of the captives”.

Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No one is a human shield because they live where they live. The IDF is bombing schools and shelters and universities. Hard pill to swallow, but yes...

I'm sure many here have tried to explain this to you over and over... It's not hard, just go and read about what a human shield is.

Goodbye and have a nice life. I do hope you one day understand, though I don't place any hopes too high on it.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hamas built tunnels under the schools and shelters and university.

Again. When they launched terrorist attacks from their tunnels, underneath schools and shelters and university, digging under the foundation, isn't it Hamas that made those buildings inhabitable?

The whole place needs to be paved over and rebuilt because of the unsafe tunnels.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_shields_in_the_Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict

Hamas has also been accused of using human shields strategically by NATO, the UN, EU, US, Israel, and several European countries. This strategy has included launching rockets and positioning military infrastructure in civilian areas, and aimed at exploiting Israel's efforts to minimize civilian casualties and Western public opinion, has been observed in various conflicts, including the 2008, 2014, and 2023 Israel-Hamas wars. This tactic of human shields has been cited as a form of 'lawfare' by NATO, utilizing legal and public platforms to challenge adversaries, and has been offered as an explanation for Israel's attacks on civilian infrastructure.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Just fyi for other people reading, proximity shielding is questionable and unlike classical or basically real human shielding.

Here, some more Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_shield

Authors Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini, elaborating on their book, Human Shields: A History of People in the Line of Fire, discuss "proximate shields", humans as shields merely due to proximity to belligerents and assert that this type has become "by far the most prominent type of shield in contemporary discourse". They say that the proximate shielding accusation has been used by States to cover-up war crimes against civilian populations and that human rights organizations frequently fail to question this charge which they claim is being improperly used to justify civilian deaths.[9]

Sorry, not really replying to you in particular, but it's hard to let this one slip. Proximity shielding is horse-shit invented by hateful people to justify killing civilians. Israel demonstrates a classic use of this.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I agree human shields could be used to cover up war crimes.

On the other hand, possibly does not equal probability.

Which do you find more credible?

Every single time something explodes, there's Hamas to say "no members of Hamas, no weapons, and no tunnels were present at the location. Everyone killed was an innocent civilian." Obviously you must agree: that cannot possibly be true every single time. Because of that, I don't give much credibility to Hamas's self-serving statements about who was killed and who was not.

Israel's explanations are at least plausible.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I really wish you would stop saying such illogical things.

There being X number of Hamas members (which I never denied and I doubt anyone here did) doesn't justify killing tens of civilians. You seem to think Palestinian life is worthless.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I actually believe that every life is important and equal, that every death diminishes us all. I just disagree that there is any moral obligation to not engage a valid military target when:

A. The civilians present are there as part of the enemy's formal strategy of using human shields; and

B. There is a reasonable warning.

You show me where the dead civilians were not either voluntary or involuntary human shields, where there was no warning, and where there was no valid military target, and I'll join you in calling it a war crime.

Whenever someone has tried, with literally thirty seconds of research the key details of what they've claimed falls apart. Mostly, there have been warnings before every bombing.

Not sure about those tank shells today at the training center. As I said, if not, I'll call it a war crime right there with you. War is awful and every war kills innocent people. I also believe a little war with Hamas is better than a massive war with Iran, which is where we will end up if the civilized world just lets Hamas and similar ideologies start having their own countries as a reward for making effective use of human shields.

Can you really say my logic is flawed? Seems nonfalacious and straightforward. I can see how it sounds calous, but that's emotion, not logic.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
241 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39167 readers
2183 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS