989

Netflix enshittification will continue until morale improves (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 10 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm not sure why there are always monopoly apologists popping up in these. You know Netflix isn't any less greedy than the studios, right? A private monopoly isn't a good thing.

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Why are you that antagonizing?

A private monopoly isn’t a good thing.

Most times. But for media, people want to have all their media in one place for a cheap price - so far only monopolistic or oligopolistic services were able to provide that. It worked quite well for games and in some form for music (you will often have single right management companies in the music industry - like BMI in USA or GEMA in Germany). But in general, I would agree that monopolies (outside natural monopolies and those should be run by the state) are unfavorable for the customer.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

There's an alternative. Because of exclusivity deals, you think a monopoly would be good for users, but with a monopoly then the company could charge $200/month because customers literally have nowhere else to go. A better system would be significantly reduced exclusivity so that 1st party media is the only exclusive content. This way, there would be more than 1 or 2 options, but way fewer than what we currently have, and the 5 or so companies remaining would compete based on their own original content, customer service, quality of service, and UI. Streaming apps with only one or two interesting pieces of original content could license out to all of the remaining few streamers and shut down their dead app. I know the quality dropped like a fucking rock, but a few years back people were excited to be subscribed to Disney+ for Wandavision and The Mandalorian. 5 years ago, people were excited to be subscribed to Netflix for Stranger Things and Orange is the New Black.

I was frustrated af a few nights ago trying to find X-Men First Class. Days of Future Past is on Max. X-Men, X-Men: The Last Stand, the 3 Wolverine movies, X-Men Apocalypse, and X-Men: Dark Phoenix are all on Disney+. So where the fuck are X-Men 2 and X-Men: First Class?! To watch the X-Men movies (which are all from the same studios), paying for 2 streaming services isn't enough?!

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

and the 5 or so companies remaining would compete based on their own original content

I don't see how this is any better, since if you want a specific show produced by a specific company you would still need to subscribe to their service, kind of the same problem we having right now.

Again, I'm not arguing for monopolies in general. But with media it's what customers want - a single service they can access all the media they want, with reasonable prices or a subscription model.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have two possible solutions then, each with their own drawback.

Solution 1 is to nationalize media. The closest realistic thing is something we already have: libraries. The drawback is that content is massively limited and it's pretty inconvenient, but the cost is bundled in with other nationalized services like firefighters and the postal service.

Solution 2 is piracy. The drawback is that it's illegal and you risk prison time and huge fines, but the cost is either free or relatively cheap in exchange for less chance of getting caught, and the selection of content is damn near everything. There is quite a bit of work at the onset, but it is reasonably convenient to enjoy.