300
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
300 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
59381 readers
1037 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm not a lawyer, but I think there's "spirit of the law" in EU, which means that even though Apple technically allowed sideloading, their implementation goes against the INTENTION of the law and is illegal.
They aren't even allowing sideloading. They are allowing alternative app stores that they approve, and Apple expects a 27% cut from all app sales after it hits a million downloads.
This means that something like F-Droid on iOS wouldn't be possible due to expense.
Apple isn't going to let you just download an ipa and install it like you can on Android.
You don't own the device you paid for (this could be said about most tech products nowadays)
Meh. It's basically the same thing - an alternative app store is the most user friendly way to do this anyway and the EU courts will force Apple to approve any reasonable app store.
No you're thinking of the changes Apple just made to comply with their recent loss in the USA court. That only applies to the USA.
In the EU (and only the EU) instead of charging a percentage fee there's going to be two* 50 cent fees (per user, per year). Spotify, for example, would pay $100 million per year if they choose to "sideload".
(* the app developer pays 50 cents per user per year, and whoever distributes the app also pays 50 cents per user per year)
Having to pay Apple any amount for distributing apps not on their app store is just rediculous. Apple is not curating or providing support for the app in any way.
App developers don't have to pay the OS developer for any other OS (including Apple with macOS and Google with Android) to distribute apps on their website; why should it be any different with iOS? 50 cents per user per year, along with the same from the app distribution network means that indie developers will be forced to monitize their apps if they have any desire to distribute a sideloaded app on iOS, and the only ones who will be able to run alternative app stores are large companies with the capitol to do so.
Apple wants to dip their fingers where they don't belong. This is complying with the EU regulation in bad faith.
Also on top of that, the same fee applies on Apple's App Store as well.
I hope you're right