43
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

TOML and YAML both have the problem that if you receive an incomplete document, there's a decent chance you can't tell. JSON doesn't have that because of the closing curly.

[-] AMDmi3@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

That's not a problem of a format and should be handled by transport or storage.

[-] Turun@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

It very much is an aspect of the format. You may deem it unimportant, but it's a feature that is missing from toml and yaml.

[-] AMDmi3@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's not a responsibly of the format, so, at most, it's a mere side effect. In any practical process which could result with truncated data, even if it handles data with such property, it should be wrapped in a container which includes length. At the very least, it would allow to trace the source of truncation, e.g. was the data originally truncated, or was it truncated in the process, and change the format without shooting in oneselves foot. And the generating side should always provide success flag which should be properly handled, since it may produce syntactically correct, but semantically invalid data. Such as checking exit code of process which generates json/yaml in question

[-] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

What about processes that terminate before writing the whole thing? You can't protect against everything. Blame other processes all you want but the language spec allows for confusion.

[-] AMDmi3@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You just check the exit code, no? The other process may fail while generating syntactically correct data too, regardless of format.

[-] suy@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago

Doesn't YAML have a (seldom used) feature of a start and end of document marker? The "YAML frontmatter" that a few markdown documents have, uses this.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Good point, I'd been interested in using toml

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

On the other hand, I hate that with JSON you can only store one document per file.

Some programs allow you to omit the outside braces, others require it.

But I do hate toml, and I don’t much like yaml either (why are there like 8 whitespace permutations?!)

[-] Azzk1kr@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

What's wrong with TOML? I personally think it's great for configuration purposes.

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

One thing you can run into is that nesting things is hard in TOML: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48998034/does-toml-support-nested-arrays-of-objects-tables

The syntax is simply not built for that, because .ini format.

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
43 points (86.4% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
46 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS