129
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
129 points (98.5% liked)
News
35800 readers
581 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is not suspicious at all. Just regular business man doing business man things. Move along citizen.
I'm not even mad about it. Maybe this treatment of billionaires will go global.
Isn't this like an evil being devoured by a greater evil? It's not like the power and money is being returned to the people.
I know China is the boogie man, and truthfully they do some foul stuff, but if you look at their infrastructure improvements over the past 40 years I'd say they're doing a hell of a lot more of returning wealth to the people than western societies.
Elaborate on infrastructure improvements? China's massive property crisis, ageing population, and government that is so iron fisted it gets offended by other countries existing and 64 as a sequence of numbers. Plus the leadership just elected itself extra terms. China is a sidegrade at best.
So I get the sentiment, but you ever think about the long term consequences of something like this?
For example: one day the billioares are getting taxed 75%, and are audited frequently by the irs...a generation or two and a few bucks to the right political group later and middle-lowrr class now shoulder the tax & audit burden.
We would all be cheering if Bezos & Musk "dissappeared" today, but it would be us disappearing tomorrow.
EDIT: oh no, I didn't mean "don't tax the wealthy" I meant to refer how taxes USED to be more proportional but they used wealth and influence to shift the burden.
Basically I ham fisted the analogy.
What billionaire pays 75%? That was before Nixon i think.
But that already happens? They reduced the IRS budget and now all they can do is audit single digit millionaires and middle class people.
This was my analogy...you could cheer now but regret it later when the government thinks you're a "problem"
Your reason not to tax and audit billionaires is “we’ll get taxed and audited too?” Newsflash, we already do.
Ok so you misunderstood the point. I was NOT saying don't tax the wealthy.
If the Government disappears someone, even if it's a popular thing, those with wealth will eventually get the focus directed at the mid/poor...the example I made was the way taxes used to be more proportional for the wealthy.
So if there is no accountability, anyone in disfavor of whomever is in power can just be "dealt with".
I hope he found a small village somewhere, and learned that a simple life caring for those around you is better than amassing tremendous wealth.
That would be a happy ending for him but I'm guessing he got Mao's old room at the re-education center.
I dunno about it being a happy ending. There have been a few documentaries on rural China and it seems like some rough living.
There's a 0% chance of this happening - if the CCP is mad enough at him to take his money, they'll also lock him up forever or execute him.
After all, it happens frequently