62
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echo64@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

It's more likely that they see rust as a good successor to their legacy c++ code. Microsoft has always been heavily invested in C++ after all.

They don't want to sell rust. It's not a money maker for them.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

The article is clear that this is about C# not C++. Is the romance for managed languages wearing off - I wonder what issues they are seeing.

Microsoft is big in C++, but they are also pushing C++ to be a lot safer. Modern C++ isn't as safe as rust, but it is still much safer than C or C++98.

[-] notriddle@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Tail latency and memory usage?

It's hard for me to come up with any other big advantages that Rust has and C# couldn't easily lift.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Hopefully they won’t come up with some kind of a Rust/CLI, a version of Rust with GC support.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
62 points (97.0% liked)

Rust

5981 readers
109 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS