98
Google’s Once Happy Offices Feel the Chill of Layoffs
(www.nytimes.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
98 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
59197 readers
926 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sundar Pichai needs to go. In his tenure there has lead to more bad decisions than good, and now their show horse Google Search, is beginning to stagnate.
They need to turn things around fast if they want to keep their reputation and marketshare from dwindling.
As long as it's on the stock market and the expectation from share holders is infinite growth nothing will change no matter who's in charge.
Stagnating? A lot of people would argue that it's gotten considerably worse than it used to be.
I would probably use the word "fester" instead of "stagnate"
SEO vs search engines is an arms race. Stagnating means the quality of results declines over time.
A few days ago I got one of the Google IO talks about Android from 2011 recommended on YT. You really can just feel that it was a totally different company. You had devs from Google on stage extremly excitied to show off the cool things they added. Incomparable to now.
Agreed, the problem is that Google has zero vision and product roadmap and that responsibility rests on the CEO and the team they have below. They have continually eroded their customers' and users' trust in the company under Sundar's leadership. At some point this has to affect their bottom line at which point he will have to answer to the shareholders.
The problem is there's no one better to do it. He's not great, but anyone else the board would pick as replacement is going to bow even harder to Wall Street.
Is Google turning into IBM?
This feels more like the Ballmer period of Microsoft.
They probably already have...