722
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Dude dirigibles are STUPID EFFICIENT because they don't have to fly. They just float so you only need some tiny little fans to move them in the direction you like. I really do wish they'd come back

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Airships; When you want to be as fast as an ocean liner, as cheap as an airplane, and as subtle as a train.

[-] HighElfMage@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Hello, airplanes? It's blimps, you win!

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For the last time! It's filled with HELIUUUUUUUUM......

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Jesus, what are you still not getting about that? Umm core concept?

[-] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Something something oh the humanity...

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It can't be just that.

(I despise the "something something" meme, but that's another story.)

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Well, that's a big one. Hydrogen is a much more available element to pump up an airship, and with hydrogen effectively off the table, then helium which if used at scale would be a problem, and it's already a bit of a problem as it is.

Aside from that, it forever shaped public perception, so airships have an uphill battle.

But it's still a thing, the butt-looking Airlander wants to bring back the airship. Their '10' model however has half the cargo payload of a 737. Their more hypothetical '50' would compete with an A300 on Cargo, which is respectable. However the top speed is 85mph, so 6 times slower than a typical cargo aircraft. However it may be able to tout versatility closer to a tractor trailer, they do still need a landing area, but not so much a runway. Tractor trailers are often used for long haul despite not being able to go 85mph, and definitely not 'as the crow flies'.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Afaik, mostly for not being too efficient in a suboptimal environment. Also for having a limit on minimal size, but there has been an article somewhere, I'll update if I find it

Edit: haven't found the article, but what I found is this. They fly relatively low (under 2 km), have a hard time going against wind, old ones also had trouble landing. Also contemporary ones are more of a hybrid of dirigible, plane, and helicopter, that probably makes them expensive, too. Existing airship infrastructure is also not suitable for them

Edit2: oh, and some claim that dirigibles don't work for commerce because commerce is too conservative, but it's not too likely because there were news of dirigibles almost taking over the cargo transportation since like 1960s and it didn't yet, so likely there are things to be solved

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
722 points (96.0% liked)

News

23655 readers
3645 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS