921
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MxM111@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago

Well, if training is included, then why it is not included for the developer? From his first days of his life?

[-] RealJoL@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

The difference is that the dev paid for their training themselves

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Sort of... If the dev didn't pay for their training, they wouldn't need as big of a wage to pay off their training debt (the usual scenario I'd wager).

So in a way the company is currently paying off the debt for the Devs training, most of the time.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

The company OpenAI also paid for LLM training and then sell LLM to users.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

When did the training happen? The LLM is trained for the task starting when the task is assigned. The developer's training has already completed, for this task at least.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No? The LLM was trained before you ever even interacted with it. They're not going to train a model on the fly each time you want to use it, that's fucking ridiculous.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

That's the joke that the comic is making. Whether or not it's reflective of reality, they're joking about a company training a new AI model to calculate the area of rectangles.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

And even if they do need to train a model, transfer learning is often a viable shortcut

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
921 points (94.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32562 readers
415 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS