92
Strings do too many things (buttondown.email)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago
[-] Jesus_666@feddit.de 10 points 9 months ago

Which ones? In RFC 5322 every address contains an addr-spec at some point, which in turn must include an @. RFC 6854 does not seem to change this. Or did I misread something?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

EDIT: I'M DUMB I THOUGHT YOU MEANT A LITERAL "." , that regex is indeed correct.

Original:

This is a valid address: user.name@[IPv6:2001:db8:1ff::a0b:dbd0]

Relevant spec: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321#section-4.1.3

And you all doubted me... :P

Edit: Wait, I also don't think local-part even needs a "." in it? user@domain.com should be valid as well.

[-] Jesus_666@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And it's matched by .+@.+ as it contains an @.

Remember, we're taking about regular expressions here so .+ means "a sequence of one or more arbitrary characters". It does not imply that an actual dot is present.

(And I overlooked the edit. Oops.)

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
92 points (89.0% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
196 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS