334
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 107 points 1 year ago

Nice try CloudFlare,
but I'm still picking Quad9 any day over you:

https://www.quad9.net/

[-] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, that might be the shortest-representation IPv6 DNS server I've seen to date: 2620:fe::9

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.

[-] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago
[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

I found them via IP address, so I don't know anything about the company beyond that.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago
[-] SteveTech@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Nah, apparently it's completely valid to end IPv6 addresses with a 0. And I haven't done much research, but it seems IPv6 really doesn't have network addresses the way IPv4 does.

Also you can ping them and they reply.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can have .0 as a host. 10.0.1.0/23 is a perfectly valid host, same with 10.0.0.255/23

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

9.9.9.9 has twice the latency for me. Why pick quad9 over, say, 1.1.1.2?

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Twice the latency for DNS results? Care to give concrete examples? DNS is usually very fast. Twice as long as very fast is still pretty quick, in my opinion.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm always on VPN, so latencies add up.

dig +stats @1.1.1.1 www.google.com | grep '[\d]+ msec'

gives me 10-20ms using a nearby vpn server

dig +stats @9.9.9.9 www.google.com | grep '[\d]+ msec'

gets me 30-50 ms, and not rarely >100ms.

[-] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Plus DNS caching... I do DOT or DOH (forget which, setup years ago) from my router's local DNS server without any noticeable latency.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

kinda hate how they don't provide dns with dnssec but no malware blocking (i prefer my dns to always just resolve stuff regardless if it's "malware" or not)
also their default dns does has ECS disabled (they have an alternative one tho)

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
334 points (91.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

36513 readers
129 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS