64
submitted 7 months ago by Gaywallet@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Creesch@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I said clickbait about the AI specific thing. Which I do stand by. To be more direct, if peer reviewers don't review and editors don't edit you can have all the theoretical safeguards in place, but those will do jack shit. Procedures are meaningless if they are not being followed properly.

Attributions can be faked, just like these images are now already being faked. If the peer review process is already under tremendous pressure to keep up for various reasons then adding more things to it might actually just make things worse.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
64 points (100.0% liked)

Science

12955 readers
124 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS