163
submitted 10 months ago by redtree3@beehaw.org to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

"Making matters worse, if Trump is elected this year he could veto any congressional attempt to reverse such a disastrous ruling of the Court by passing a law guaranteeing same sex marriage rights."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org 6 points 10 months ago

Question because my reading comprehension is bad: would this kill same-sex marriage nationwide, or would it just allow red states to say they won't recognize it? Not to say the latter isn't bad, I'm just curious if this would fuck over my ability to even get married in, say, Washington or Oregon.

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 29 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it essentially makes it a state issue, and each state can ban, or not, and choose to recognize marriages from other states, or not. So if you got married in Washington that might allow same-sex marriage and respect marriages from other states, and then you move to e.g. Tennessee that banned it and didn't recognize out of state marriages, your marriage essentially wouldn't exist there. I also imagine for the case of emergencies and whatnot, if you were traveling through such a state, you wouldn't be recognized as spouses, making it literally a life or death issue for travel.

It's very, very bad.

[-] agegamon@beehaw.org 19 points 10 months ago

Holy shit, I didn't draw up the situation of travelling while married as a problem but you're absolutely right. It's already getting extremely tricky to figure out what places are OK or no-go for trans and NB people, this is just going to make things so much more fucking worse.

Atlanta for example is a massive air travel hub. What if Georgia doesn't uphold same-sex marriage? What about international travellers who are married abroad?

JFC. These idiots.

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago

Shows how sheltered I am, but it never occurred to be that same-sex couples from other countries might have trouble traveling in the US because of this. I just thought of this as an American problem.

That said, I started boycotting tourism to the United States in the Bush administration and haven't been back since. My passport even expired over a decade ago.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What an excellent scheme to keep talents away from entering the red states for a job.

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

It sounds odd but that’s the point. Educated voters vote democrat.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Which drives prices in those states down.

Which makes them attractive to new businesses, and existing businesses expanding.

Which means they'll start trickling into those now-cheap red states.

Which means that folks who need jobs will have to start at least considering moving to and living in those states.

The only thing that abhors a vacuum more strongly than Nature is Money.

[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 months ago

Current federal law requires states to recognize all marriages, including same-sex marriages, from other states but does not require them to issue licenses within their state. The previous Supreme Court had determined the constitution required states to do so, but that could be overturned. They could also decide the federal law is unconstitutional, but that is less likely.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Maybe even that depends on the judges.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
163 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6209 readers
26 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS