746
submitted 2 years ago by ezmack@lemmy.ml to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

I have examined this abstraction of a map thoroughly.

I do not see any garbage dumps, recycling facilities, sewage processing, cemeteries, energy production, water production...

I could carry on, but this map means almost nothing with all sorts of factors missing.

[-] Distributed@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago

Without digging in to the numbers further than just looking at this map, could this be because the relative areas of the factors you listed didn't pass a threshold to make it? @ezmack what data source was used for this?

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not OP, but I'd think cemeteries should outweigh golf courses in land area.

Feel free to prove me wrong though.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think you might underestimate golf course land use, as well as miss that a lot of that mightve just been counted with the surrounding neighborhoods, since that's more of a community service

[-] BlackRose@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

Urban-commercial

[-] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

its also missing the fact that tons of animal pastures is on federal land.

[-] Minusfourty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Those take up less space than you'd think

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Well, I grew up on 60 acres with like 18 horses and 25 goats. Can't say I've visited every farm out there to know how large or how cramped they might be.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
746 points (92.5% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

9 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS