186
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
186 points (89.4% liked)
Open Source
31223 readers
333 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Thanks. I was interested how it was getting access to Spotify music library and suggestion algorithms but turns out it just isn't.
Wonder why is trying to pretend to be Spotify when it could just market itself as a YouTube music interface.
I don't know why, but personally it really rubs me the wrong way.
It's not really "false advertising", since it's not a paid app, but still...
Real open source alternatives exist, but they require Spotify Premium to actually stream music legally straight from Spotify.
What are those open source alternatives you mention?
A few are mentioned here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Spotify#Third-party_clients
Are those Spotify alternative clients just for a better ux?
Yeah, but I don't really use them, so not the best person to ask. :)
I don't really see any false advertising. It is explicitly described as exactly what it is.
I guess it lacks the suggestion algo but that's the privacy compromise I guess.
No, it's not.
It says it's a "Spotify client". It simply isn't.
Read the next few words
Because people like me want all my spotify playlists regardless of where they are getting streamed.