249

Aaron Bushnell's Facebook Reveals Final Message Before Self-Immolation (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 9 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Newsweek.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

so that maybe others will have a better chance at achieving their goals

How?

I've never heard of a situation that could be improved by someone lighting themselves on fire.

That kind of dedication directed towards acts of mutual aid would be invaluable. I think it's sad that it was wasted on something so ephemeral.

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/180606

There are a few line in this I really like

The famous photograph of the monk is shocking. It was like nothing people had seen before. Quang Duc sits peacefully in the meditative lotus position as the flames engulf him. The image is so perplexing, so contrary to ideas of self-preservation that the audience has to stop and ask questions about what is happening.

and this

The self-immolation was a powerful act of psychological warfare. By being willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for his people, Quang Duc showed the strength and immovable will of the Buddhist community. A foe that isn’t afraid of a painful death cannot be bullied and cajoled into submission.

I read a couple other articles on the history of self immolation. There was a new yorker article that did a good job on being scepitcal of the practice. Was suprised to find out that there are a lot more cases of it that I expected. Then again, the handful of cases where it had the intended effect were so successful that it makes sense that others would do the same hoping to get the same reaction (the Tibetan monks, the Arab Spring, etc)

But it definitely seems fair to say it doesn't pack the punch it used to. Which might be good reason to choose other actions.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

the handful of cases where it had the intended effect were so successful that it makes sense that others would do the same hoping to get the same reaction (the Tibetan monks, the Arab Spring, etc)

There's no way to objectively determine if self immolation is "effective". Take Tibet, yes it's a famous photograph, but did it free Tibet? Was the monks goal to become a famous image, or was it to end the cultural genocide?

What about the Arab spring? Was that man's goal to kick off a movement that would eventually destabilize the entire region, leading to more autocratic governments securing power?

Is self immolation a powerful act? Yes, but power without direction is meaningless. Real change requires collective action, not independent acts of "psychological warfare".

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024

249 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19135 readers

1180 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News