975
submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 34 points 8 months ago

Fuck this joker. He’s the IDIOT that said, as the SURGEON GENERAL, “Seriously people - STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!” (Tweet was then deleted). He should lose his medical license and be imprisoned for the excessive number of deaths his lies caused.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

When exactly did he say this? At the beginning of the pandemic when things were still uncertain?

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you if he said that at the beginning. To be clear, I know masks were an effective protection against the coronavirus. But at that time there was a lot of uncertainty, first, and second, he was half-right: there was a shortage of masks, and medical professionals needed them at a very critical time. I followed that advice. Then when the CDC said "oops, no actually DO wear masks!" I started wearing them.

So..... I'm not saying he was right. I'm just saying we should judge people in context. Don't pile him up with the true idiot anti-mask bundle.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

They were lying in order to get as many masks as possible to healthcare staff. Perhaps they saved more lives doing so

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And perhaps they didn't.

I'm not putting the full blame of the Anti-Covid nonsense on him - but that decision was certainly straw on the camels back. I know I will never forget.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Smart people understand that science is fallible. As more information becomes available, science can be corrected.

Covid denialism came out of mishandling that. People believing that since science wasn’t infallible, it can’t be trusted.

It’s a problem with the state of education in this country. Same reason why people don’t believe in gravity because “it’s just a theory”.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There is a distinct difference between science being fallible, and being told that Life Preserver Jackets won't save you - while you're on a sinking ship - and every medical professional around you goes to extreme lengths to acquire as many life preservers as possible.

They at no-point-in-time believed masks were pointless.

I get it. I really do. Doesn't make it right.


Just in case:

Well, the reason for that is that we were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply. And we wanted to make sure that the people namely, the health care workers, who were brave enough to put themselves in a harm way, to take care of people who you know were infected with the coronavirus and the danger of them getting infected

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

I don’t agree with it, but I get it.

We had a very limited supply of masks in the country. Remember, we had people volunteering to stitch cloth masks or 3D printed “straps” for face shields…to donate to doctors and nurses who couldn’t get enough masks to stay safe. Breweries and distilleries were re-tooling to make hand sanitizer.

Meanwhile we were already at the start of the supply chain itself collapsing.

We were at a point where Trump was ~~hijacking~~ intercepting shipments of masks to ~~scalp~~ redistribute them to ~~the highest bidder~~ hospitals that needed them more.

Now, if they had said that day “everyone needs to wear a mask in public”, that would have completely toppled the supply for hospitals, and I’d say it’s significantly more critical for frontline workers to have them than people who were able to hunker down and wait until Easter when the whole thing blows over (womp womp).

You know that any other messaging would’ve caused a rush on face masks and frontline workers, and probably made the whole thing worse.

In retrospect it’s easy to say that they should have been transparent about the messaging. But in retrospect, we also know that most people are selfish assholes.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You don't get to play the Prisoners Dilemma, publicly betray the other as your opening gambit, and then foam at the mouth that everyone is refusing to cooperate for the next 3 years.

There is no point in arguing this.

You can believe the ends justify the means however you want.

I watched people very-close-to-me die from COVID in front of me as an essential worker. I was told a mask would not save my life. I was a pig for the slaughter.

Science can be infallible. People aren't. I will never trust the CDC again.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Sure, and I agree it was a bad idea because it burned so much credibility. And secondly, I can't imagine it making a real difference. Those who had the means to acquire masks at that time wouldn't be dumb enough to believe it.

And I also agree that it's good to remind everybody every once in a while.

But my main point is that they didn't lie because they are bad people that were preparing the masses for a one world government - they did it because they saw hospital staff falling ill or dying at unsustainable rates and were willing to do almost anything to slow that.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching

That's technically true, but the correct answer is more nuanced then the average adult has the attention span to understand or the character limit of twitter.

Masks are better at stopping the wearer from spreading it to other people, but a lot of people were getting infected through spit going into their eyes. Did this post occur during the mask shortage were even surgeons couldn't get the masks they needed to do their work? The quote you gave said to stop buying masks, not to stop wearing them. Best practice was to use a reusable mask and face shield.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

We've already had this discussion ad nauseum since 2020. It's 2024. Just stop with spreading information that can fuel the anti-mask bullshit.

I understand that wearing eye protection can reduce the risk of catching the virus. But to say "masks are not effective" being technically true is irresponsible.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

People only accepting simple answers are why so many people died. I never said masks aren't effective. You reduced my comment until it lost it's original meaning.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Yeah, sorry, man. Freaking anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers had me on edge for so long, that it was practically an automatic response.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
975 points (98.8% liked)

News

23296 readers
1123 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS