182
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
182 points (98.4% liked)
politics
19088 readers
1683 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I don't know, this seems more about not interfering with police work than stopping the public from filming police. I do think people should be allowed to film them.
It's already illegal to interfere. This is to prevent people from holding the police accountable. Let's say you see 10 white police officers beating a black man while calling him the N word. You whip out your phone and hit record.
A police officer stops what he's doing and walks to you. You're now within 8 feet of the officer so you need to either stop recording or go back. If you stop recording, the police have successfully stopped you from documenting what they were doing despite you not actually interfering with police business.
If you keep recording and walk back, though, the officer keeps advancing. By the time he stops and lets you keep recording, you can't see anything that is happening. Your recording is now useless.
Alternatively, since you were recording before you backed up, you might have broken the law and now can be arrested by the officer. He confiscates your phone as evidence. If you're released and given the phone back, it's been wiped clean (or just smashed to bits).
It's not about keeping people from interfering with the police. It's about keeping people from keeping the police from abusing their power.
Your example does make sense
It becomes an issue because the cops can simply say they were within 8 feet or approach the person filming and then make them stop. It would be instantly abused to stop evidence of discrimination or anything else. Striking this down was the right choice
Maybe just not have an opinion?
I have an opinion on everything