320
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Fair enough, but in a way chickens kinda should be on there anyways. They can't exactly fly very far, spend like 98% of their life on the ground, and humans breed them for food.

[-] BlackRose@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think the argument was chickens not being mammals.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ah, indeed. Still seems they should have been a bit more broad than restricting the data to land mammals, more like humans vs food.

Oh well, it is what it is.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

They don't spend 98% of their life on the ground in the wild. They sleep in trees, just like turkeys and peacocks.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

90%+ chickens are bred for food, I don't think there's all that many truly wild chickens out there anymore.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

There are probably some somewhere, but yeah not many. However the ones that are bred for food typically weigh more.

Hell, if you let a meat chicken grow beyond its sell-by date, there's a good chance it will develop so much muscle mass it cannot stand up anymore, and it will rot to death on the spot.

[-] blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm pretty sure they were domesticated from something (a South Asian jungle fowl, I believe) to the extent that they are no longer even the same species. So any "wild" chickens would just be feral escapees.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
320 points (92.3% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

9 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS