320
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, but in a way chickens kinda should be on there anyways. They can't exactly fly very far, spend like 98% of their life on the ground, and humans breed them for food.

[-] BlackRose@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the argument was chickens not being mammals.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, indeed. Still seems they should have been a bit more broad than restricting the data to land mammals, more like humans vs food.

Oh well, it is what it is.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

They don't spend 98% of their life on the ground in the wild. They sleep in trees, just like turkeys and peacocks.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

90%+ chickens are bred for food, I don't think there's all that many truly wild chickens out there anymore.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

There are probably some somewhere, but yeah not many. However the ones that are bred for food typically weigh more.

Hell, if you let a meat chicken grow beyond its sell-by date, there's a good chance it will develop so much muscle mass it cannot stand up anymore, and it will rot to death on the spot.

[-] blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty sure they were domesticated from something (a South Asian jungle fowl, I believe) to the extent that they are no longer even the same species. So any "wild" chickens would just be feral escapees.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
320 points (92.3% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

9 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS