867

Project 2025’s 180-Day Playbook is a remarkably detailed guide to turning the United States into a fascist’s paradise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

I remember when republicans were about less government. Pepperidge farms remembers….

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think they ever truly were. They've always supported the expansion of the military and police, having shit loads of foreign military bases, controlling women, controlling the LGBTQ+. The only way they could ever be considered to be wanting less government is in the form of their laissez-faire, pro-privitization economic policy, which just lets corporations do whatever the hell they like. So all it is, is trading one form of control to another. Instead of government controlling things, corporations control everything.

The GOP platform is, and always has been anti-freedom.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, many accept what they're told at face value and don't have the critical thinking skills to know the difference.

[-] captainthroatfuck@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

At the risk of sounding like Peterson (but reversed right to left), it's always been about an in group that deserves to rule, and an out group that people punish. It's that simple with them, why all the hypocrisy. It's literally that simple. I'm a good guy, they're bad, they disagree with me, that means they're bad and should be punished. Zero sum game stuff

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Absolutely agreed.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I remember when republicans were about less government.

They never really were. They've always been the party of corporate cronyism, with "less government" only ever applying to institutions from which they couldn't generate profit.

[-] winky9827b@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Small government has only ever meant minimal regulation. It means nothing when it comes to civil rights or liberties.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I wish it meant minimal regulation.

But set aside abortion and immigration. I'm seeing some crazy efforts to regulate the solar and wind energy industries. I'm seeing efforts to restrict how municipal governments can operate education and transportation infrastructure. In Austin TX, the state government threatened to take over the municipal police department. In Houston TX, they removed the Independent School District and installed their own flacks. Texas law prohibits state agencies and political subdivisions (“Governmental Entities”) from contracting with businesses that boycott energy companies, discriminate against firearm entities or associations, or boycott Israel, which has an enormous impact on the statewide financial system.

So, I'm seeing lots of statewide regulation.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
867 points (97.0% liked)

News

35754 readers
765 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS