289
submitted 8 months ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago

Toyota has invested heavily into hydrogen, and so are against electrification

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 8 months ago

Hydrogen would be cleaner in the long run, too, wouldn't it? Since you wouldn't need to mine lithium for batteries and such.

[-] MrPozor@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 8 months ago

Yes but where is the hydrogen coming from? Also hydrogen cars are less efficient than battery powered EVs.

[-] Fungah@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Water, I think? I think the hydrogen is less of an issue than the hydrogen fuel cell though.

Only 10 more years to go!

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 14 points 8 months ago

Unless we improve the efficiency of both electrolysis and fuel cell conversion to about 98%, we won't beat the batteries.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -1 points 8 months ago

Yes but where is the hydrogen coming from?

Water.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 19 points 8 months ago

Natural gas, primarily.

Obtaining hydrogen from water is much more energy-demanding, and the efficiency of the entire water cycle (water electrolysis, hydrogen transportation, electrical conversion) is extremely low compared to just charging batteries.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

It wouldn't. Hydrogen production from any source is extremely power intense. Especially so from water. The amount of energy wasted on hydrogen production is easily offset by battery production and recycling. And that's not even accounting for hydrogen tank production, which is another hell hole.

[-] bwrsandman@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Not the mention the overwhelming vast majority of hydrogen today is produced from fossil fuels and not through electrolysis.

Let's not kid ourselves, anyone advocating for hydrogen as fuel is defending the continued existence of the fossil fuel industry.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

There are plenty of places with abundant green energy, and abundant water. As for the tank yea, but idk if it's worse than lithium

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The energy is only abundant until the moment you start wasting it. Hydrogen fuel is a waste of energy.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Renewable energy doesn't have a tap, you either use it when generated or don't. If there's an excess now it can be used. But yea hydrogen fuel may be a waste or not I don't know. But to say theres an energy shortage everywhere is just not true.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Renewable energy doesn't mean infinite energy.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I never said it does. I did say for example there are areas that generate hydroelectric/wind/solar power that otherwise would be effectively wasted. Hydroelectric power can control the flow partially to bank it for later, but thats not the case with the other two.

[-] SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
289 points (97.1% liked)

News

23376 readers
3025 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS