125
submitted 7 months ago by maegul@hachyderm.io to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Performance reviews are just employers controlling the narrative when employees are underpaid

Right?
If you underperform, brutal negotiations ensue … prove your value or the deal is off.

Buuut, if you’re overperforming, you get gold stickers and praise, and the possibility of a pay bump through a process controlled by the employer …

instead of you telling the employer that *they* have to prove their value or the deal is off.

Instead over performing then becomes the expectation.

@workreform

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lololol no.

The insane shit you people make up. Performance reviews are about your performance and career growth. Are you being a pain in the ass? And what do you need to do to get a promotion are the key points to go over.

If you aren't having that conversation you are doing yourself a disfavour.

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
125 points (90.3% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
451 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS