1412
That's LTT in the bottom (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 51 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Reminder that Group Policy settings are disabled in home versions, and even some of the registry entries for updates are missing. To get a full package of windows with all the options you have to pay like $400 to $600 for their LTSC or maybe some of their Enterprise versions. Honestly, if anybody pirates Windows, then definitely pirate the LTSC.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 8 months ago

I don't think many dual booters actually pay for Windows licenses.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago
[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

Though, yes, I do recommend LTSC as well (high seas and all that, since they cost a small fortune) vs. a Pro license. It's basically what Windows users were used to, a Windows install that's stuck in time, no new features, only security updates.

Oh, and no store and all that app crap, the only app installed is the settings app and there is no way to install any other store app (well, there is, but it's complicated and I would do it only of there is absolutely no other way).

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 8 months ago

I don’t think many dual booters actually pay for Windows licenses.

You probably got a license when you bought that laptop you got in 2010. And carried it forward. Just because Microsoft didn't charge for the upgrade path to get to windows 11 doesn't mean you didn't pay something for the license.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

No, I actually haven't bought a single laptop in my entire life. All my laptops are give/throw aways. The newest I have is a 3rd gen i7.

Did someone actually pay for a Windows license when he/she bought the laptop? Can't say for sure, but yes, most probably. For a Win7 license most likely since that was what was sood back then. Now I have LTSC and Linux on all of my PCs.

But me personally? No, I have never paid for a Windows license. All of the installs I have ever done for myself were pirated. From Win98 and XP onward.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 8 months ago

All my laptops are give/throw aways.

Cool then you have licenses. Whether you utilized them or not is up to you. But you have licenses.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Utilize what. They're most probably Win7 Home licenses that could be exchanged for a Win10 Home license at a certain point in time, but not any more... and I wouldn't use a Home license anyway, it's crippled AF.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Isn't gpedit not even in pro anymore?

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Why did I go through the hassle of installing enterprise and doing a bunch of PowerShell crap to put the Ms store and Xbox interface in months later when friends pressured me into playing unmodded Minecraft bedrock?

Edit: I remembered I think. It's the telemetry flag that can't be set to 0 in pro even with gpe but can in enterprise, but the stuff to make xbl gaming work probably undermines whatever it does, if it did anything in the first place.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Huh? You only need the Pro version for Group Policy and all the registry settings, and you can get licenses for ~$20 if you buy an OEM license through an authorized reseller.

There's some limitations to the OEM licenses, but I've never run into them.

As far as I'm aware, LTSC just effects the update channel that Windows Update pulls from, with LTSC getting non-critical updates later and for longer after support "ends". Usually you can switch that in the registry.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 8 months ago

Huh? Huuuuuhhhh?

I don't pretend to know the ins and outs of every windows version, but OEM versions are made to order by manufacturers and that comes with it's own special place in hell that I'm not even going to go into. LTSC has everything with no downsides, Home has Group Policy disabled, that was my comment. Despite your standoffish comment you didn't argue against any of that.

[-] Ravioli@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago
[-] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago

It's not a legal license anyway.

[-] Specal@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

This is just speculation, but I'm pretty sure Microsoft stopped caring about people pirating windows and using licences they shouldn't have. They would rather you use windows as a pirate than not use windows at all.

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

To anyone downvoting the comment above, you can use windows indefinitely without a key. The only thing that happens is you get some text on the screen (that sometimes goes away for no reason) and you can't change the background. They don't give two f's. They could easily block keys / stop them from working if misused, but they don't care. Same reason why every laptop comes with a license. They put it there because it costs them nothing. They'd rather have market share, than get money upfront. They probably make bank on other things (i.e. the analytics, ads, etc)

[-] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 5 points 8 months ago

Been like that since the 90s really. Microsoft's "secret sauce" is that they never gave a shit about the end users.

They make bank by courting enterprise users: Big companies with hundreds of employees, OEMs, governments, schools, etc.

In recent times they found a way to double-dip by putting in telemetry/data collection/ads/adware -- But before that they just didn't care.

It does help that windows makes the user develop learned helplessness and so by the time they are getting their own computer, they'll want to stay in the windows environment. So they also get the inflated marketshare, which feeds back into their pitch when they are courting those enterprises.

[-] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago

It's true. But why would anyone buy an illegal key if they can activate Windows for free?

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No they are legal. It is just an upgraded Windows 7 or 8 license.

They were throwing those away by the boatload

[-] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 8 months ago

Look at the answer on Microsoft forum. What does "legitimate" mean to you? The fact that the system will work with this key does not mean that you have the right to use Windows legally.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Microsoft allowed those licences to upgrade. They are most definitely legitimate.

No matter what a volunteer moderator says.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
1412 points (92.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21255 readers
16 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS