148
submitted 8 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Guardian

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You people are actually braidead.

Please tell me how a frigate, nevermind a fuckjng aircraft carrier can deliver supplies without a fuckjng port to dock in?

[-] homura1650@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

The big ship stays in the water, and is used to supply smaller water craft that can ferry them directly to the coast; either by using smaller existing docks, or by simplying beaching on the cost. Unless we are saying that the US military lacks the ability to do a water based ground attack unless the enemy kindly leaves a port for them to use.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There aren't any functional docs on the strip, the closes is a small marina for small bosts that has no equipment for receiving bulk supplies.

So you would have to load supplies onto lifeboats or ribs, ferry them across and unload them by hand, you wouldn't even get half a tonne per trip realistically and you spend hours loading and unloading it all.

Or if they happen to have amphibious assault ships in the area, they could move small truck of supplies on to the beach. But this would be a costly and still quite innifecient process. Which is why in any actual amphibious landing as soon as the immediate area is secured the Naval Cargo Handling Batallion builds at least a temporary dock at the landing site as soon as possible.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Aircraft carriers actually have a lot of storage space since they have to be able to cruise around for a long time without resupplying. They have many "smaller" boats surrounding them which can easily transport food if they used their life boats.

If there''s a will there's a way. People are actively dying of starvation.

Waiting multiple weeks to build a pier for "clean delivery" is what I would use the adjective in your comment for.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

How many tons of food can a lifeboat carry do you think? How does that food get loaded onto and unloaded off the boat? By hand?

If there''s a will there's a way. People are actively dying of starvation.

And the US has been airdropping food in. But there just isn't enough capacity, and Biden has been criticised for not doing enough in that case too. The real solution if for Israel to allow trucks across the land border and not machine gun residents when they try to collect the aide.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The real solution if for Israel to allow trucks across the land border and not machine gun residents when they try to collect the aide.

Yes but Biden is actively trying to pretend that isn't possible and make up excuses why he needs TWO MONTHS to build a pier to drop off food. In the hopes his voting base is stupid enough to believe he isn't actively trying to ignore the issue.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

How is he pretending that isn't possible?

How is he ignoring the issue? He's building infrastructure in order to facilitate aid delivery, because his previous action of airdropping aid into gaza doesn't have the capacity to provide enough food to alleviate the famine, and he only has to find this solution because Israel has ignored his calls to not start a ground offensive in rafah and also ignored his calls for a ceasefire.

So I really don't get how you can try and spin "he's ignoring the issue" from all that.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

What? The issue is the truck blockade imposed by israel. That's what's being ignored.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

So what do you think Biden is actuslly capable of doing about that, that he's currently not doing?

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
148 points (93.5% liked)

World News

39153 readers
1980 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS