view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Can't. it's a state civil trial. presidents can't do that.
Really, the only way he can make this go away is to shut up and pay.
And he's constitutionally incapable of either.
He can't legally, but that's not a major impediment for him
If he's president he can do a variety of things "legally" that benefit moneyed interests in the US or elsewhere.
If his son in law can get a billion dollar loan, trump can too.
If the house is Republican led, there could be no real repurcussuons except in an election.
oh like you'll get one of those again
Nope. In 30 days or whatever it is now, if he doesn’t put it up. Chubb pays for him seizes whatever collateral was put up.
It’s probably his real estate because it’s the only thing he has of significant value.
It is possible that Chubb didn’t cut him any favors and it really “just is” business. If they took say 2x in collateral, depending on the contract, they could make quite a bit of bank on that deal- or whatever they figured it was overvalued by.
Chubb put up the appeals bond for his defamation trial.
This is talking about the appeals bond for his fraud trial. Chubb (currently) has no stake in that one and Trump (currently) hasn't posted a bond for that. He has until March 25th to do so or else the state of New York is gonna be getting $400 million of new real estate.
And they won't use Trump's fraudulent valuations, either.
Ah. Even simpler then. When it expires it goes to collections and the state starts seizing assets. Either way… that’s unlikely to not be resolved before he’s the president.
My money is on this stalling being so the Truth Social merger goes through and he can loan against his stake there, that or sell shares. The preliminary valuation puts Trumps part of the post-merger company at up to $4 billion, which is absurd but also he does have an extremely specific demographic completely captured over there. It's marketing gold for unscrupulous companies and niche stuff that won't ever sell to city Dems, like truck nuts and tacticool gear.
Six points for 'tacticool'. :)
There's an article which explains that the financial document says it'll take months for that bond to be valid and it has various ways to get out of the "bond". Meaning, they were trying to get the judge to sign off on a bond which wasn't a bond.
Her attorney caught it and had them change that. I couldn't find anything that it's not a real bond? Can you link what you read?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/e-jean-carroll-s-lawyer-forces-donald-trump-to-change-his-bond/ar-BB1jI68i
https://abcnews.go.com/US/sides-ceo-company-guaranteed-trumps-92m-bond-tells/story?id=108087233