895
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I just saw a post about someone rejected for the police force for being too smart. I often wonder if we would catch a lot more criminals if cities hired much smarter people as detectives versus promoting from within the ranks.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

What is up with that? How is that not a liability/ lawsuit already?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

They successfully argued that the drudgery of police work isn't suited to people with high intelligence.

[-] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I think they did sue and lost

[-] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

IIRC, the hiring people said they worried candidates scoring too much higher than average would be more likely to show turnover from finding more prestigious jobs later or would not fit in well with their colleagues. Whether or not you agree with the decision, those are reasonable concerns to have when hiring and were applied to everyone, so he lost the discrimination suit.

[-] lath@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

I've read the story a few times over the years and it's kinda a myth, so feel free to be skeptical.

Apparently there was a program going some 40-50 years ago. Train the best and brightest, deck them with the best equipment available and send them out there as the elite. It failed horribly leading to the highest death count the police force had seen. With what little money was left, the opposite was done afterwards. Send in the dumbest hicks around and give them free reign.

It worked brilliantly. Crime rates were down, death count for the police force was down, costs were down and the bosses were happy.

Everyone else suffered, but who gave a fuck? And so, the modern police force was born.

[-] Globeparasite@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

yes, that is a very beautiful pile of bullshit. First who was running this program what is the "police force" because that doesn't exist in the US. there is a different police force for every county or city

[-] lath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Where are the reports on this program?

[-] lath@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

How should I know? Which part of "I've read the story" didn't you understand? It shows me as a reader of a story other people wrote. If you want reports, wait for someone who has them and if no one shows up, then consider it as if there aren't any and it's just a story randos on the internet passed it on.

Jeez, the nerve of some people these days! Wanting corroborated facts and written documentation for everything! Whatever happened to trust? To faith in your fellow humans? Oh yeah, we broke it repeatedly. Oh well...

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah so you can't backup what you are saying and are probably lying or misremembering. Why would I believe something you have heard from someone else 50 years ago and have no direct proof or evidence of?

Might have well have started with: my great grandpa once told me...

[-] Globeparasite@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

i am certain bro was absolutely honest about why he got rejected "smart" can mean so many things it doesn't actually mean anything

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
895 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
488 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS